gschneider
06-24-2007, 11:58 PM
Okay, after completing a watching of the relatively fantastic 1408 last night, a friend mentioned that they didn't think it could qualify as a Horror movie because - it ended "good" with the hero overcoming the evil, etc.
Anyone who has watched a bunch of horror lately knows of this trend - that either things end badly form teh beginning or there is a scene where the herror escapes/conquerors/defeats evil and then the movie ends with a sudden reappareance of the evil and then credits. This was even spoofed at the end of the animated "Monster House" to great effect.
Anyway, the argument goes that a true horror movie has to continue on past the end, so as to give an open and continuous feel to the horror to the viewers. The sense that the evil isn't over will add to the horrorific-ness of the movie as our imaginations continue to play out what happens next. But if you end it without those hints, then the movie has less effect.
I was curious other peoples thoughts about whether evil or good winning making a better horror film?
Greg
Anyone who has watched a bunch of horror lately knows of this trend - that either things end badly form teh beginning or there is a scene where the herror escapes/conquerors/defeats evil and then the movie ends with a sudden reappareance of the evil and then credits. This was even spoofed at the end of the animated "Monster House" to great effect.
Anyway, the argument goes that a true horror movie has to continue on past the end, so as to give an open and continuous feel to the horror to the viewers. The sense that the evil isn't over will add to the horrorific-ness of the movie as our imaginations continue to play out what happens next. But if you end it without those hints, then the movie has less effect.
I was curious other peoples thoughts about whether evil or good winning making a better horror film?
Greg